01
Findings
Start with a question worth checking.
Open a finding in its client and period. See what was recorded, what needs review, and which interpretation a reviewer has accepted or changed.
Client · period · finding · review state
For communications & brand-strategy agencies
From scattered evidence to a clear client brief.
Review what matters. Show what supports it. Give your client a recommendation with a clear next step.
Published pricing · per client workspace · unlimited viewer seats · 14-day trial, no card · no annual lock.
Decision brief · public recordsFarm Bill Reauthorization · demonstration workspace
200 records · Sep 15, 2026Set the fraud case aside before reporting the Farm Bill tone.
What the scores say 42% negative
The automated scores mark 83 of 200 records negative.
Google News, Bluesky, Currents, Podcast Index · one collection runWhat the records say 27 records
27 of those 83 cover one crop insurance fraud case, 16 of them on Bluesky.
Read the headlines in the full briefThe limit
With the case set aside, 35% of the records that name a tracked term are still negative.
39 of 110 records · scored automatically, not reviewedProposed next step
Report the tone from the 39 negatives that name a tracked term, and brief the fraud case on its own.
19,874Public records in 6 demonstration workspaces
2,123Iowa State Fair records in the fair's 11 days, 2.6 times the 11 days before
27 of 83Negative Farm Bill records that were one fraud case
Counted on Sep 15, 2026 from records Caerus collected from 11 public sources. The brands and topics these workspaces watch are not customers.
How the work comes together
One question. Evidence you can inspect. A decision you can revisit.
Keep the source and the judgment connected as you move from client review to a finished brief.
02
Evidence
Keep the inconvenient examples in view.
Read the source excerpts before deciding what they mean. Select both supporting and counter-evidence for the recommendation you want to make.
Full excerpt · source · date · stable reference
03
Decision brief
Give the reader a decision and its limits.
Write the recommendation, name a proposed owner, and state what to check next. Review the saved evidence-linked brief before explicitly approving an export.
Recommendation · counter-evidence · next step · PDF
A demonstration workspace, in real numbers
The fair brought 2.6 times the records. Most negatives after it never mention the fair.
Caerus watches the Iowa State Fair as a public topic, and the fair is not a customer. During the 2026 fair, August 13 to 23, the workspace collected 2,123 records from 8 sources, against 815 in the 11 days before, and raised 27 findings. The counts below are real. The layout is a simplified view of the workspace.
Client overviewIowa State FairAug 13–23, 2026 · 2,123 records
Real countsPositive75%1,590 of 2,123 · scored automatically
Records2,123815 in the 11 days before
Findings raised2718 opportunity · 5 monitor · 4 crisis
Your review queue27 raised
Findings to check
Check the source behind a finding. Keep what matters for your brief.
MomentumNext to review
2,123 records in the fair’s 11 days, where 815 came in the 11 days before
1,590 positive · 289 negative · 8 sources
Review evidence4 of the 27 findings were flagged as possible crises. Each waits for a person to read its records.
Your work · this window
Your next decision brief
- Check a finding
- Keep useful evidence
- Write the brief
After the fair, Aug 24–Sep 3743 records · 28% negative
In the 11 days after the fair, 28% of 743 records scored negative, against 12% of 815 before it. 183 of those 205 negative records never use the word fair, and neither did 90 of the 101 before it, so the rise may say more about what the sources returned than about the fair.
Read the Farm Bill briefBuilt for the next client review
Leave with a recommendation. Return with the next question.
The approved brief keeps the recommendation and its selected evidence together. A separate manual follow-up records what was checked, what remains uncertain, and when to look again.
Use the trial to compare that recurring workflow with your existing research, notes, and reporting process.
See pricing and what each tier includesStart with the output
Could this make your next review clearer?
Read the example, trace its evidence, and compare it with the advice your team prepares today.